<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>菲尔兹奖 on C.CUI's Log</title><link>https://cuicaihao.github.io/zh/tags/%E8%8F%B2%E5%B0%94%E5%85%B9%E5%A5%96/</link><description>Recent content in 菲尔兹奖 on C.CUI's Log</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>zh-Hans</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:00:00 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cuicaihao.github.io/zh/tags/%E8%8F%B2%E5%B0%94%E5%85%B9%E5%A5%96/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>科研可以规划投入，却不能按计划生产突破：从两枚菲尔兹奖说起</title><link>https://cuicaihao.github.io/zh/posts/2026-08-30-scientific-research-investment-can-be-planned-but-breakthroughs-cannot-be-scheduled-a-discussion-inspired-by-two-fields-medals/</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:00:00 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://cuicaihao.github.io/zh/posts/2026-08-30-scientific-research-investment-can-be-planned-but-breakthroughs-cannot-be-scheduled-a-discussion-inspired-by-two-fields-medals/</guid><description>王虹和邓煜获得菲尔兹奖，说明中国能够发现并培养世界一流的数学人才，也让一个更难的问题重新浮现：为什么人才、经费和论文规模的增长，不能自动转化为更多高风险、长周期的原创突破？国家可以规划科研投入、基础设施与战略方向，却无法预先确定科学发现将在何时发生。科研生态能否产生原创成果，取决于它如何分配长期探索的资源与风险。</description></item></channel></rss>