<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Research Evaluation on C.CUI's Log</title><link>https://cuicaihao.github.io/tags/research-evaluation/</link><description>Recent content in Research Evaluation on C.CUI's Log</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-AU</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:00:00 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cuicaihao.github.io/tags/research-evaluation/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Scientific Research: Investment Can Be Planned, But Breakthroughs Cannot Be Scheduled — A Discussion Inspired by Two Fields Medals</title><link>https://cuicaihao.github.io/posts/2026-08-30-scientific-research-investment-can-be-planned-but-breakthroughs-cannot-be-scheduled-a-discussion-inspired-by-two-fields-medals/</link><pubDate>Sun, 30 Aug 2026 07:00:00 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://cuicaihao.github.io/posts/2026-08-30-scientific-research-investment-can-be-planned-but-breakthroughs-cannot-be-scheduled-a-discussion-inspired-by-two-fields-medals/</guid><description>The Fields Medals awarded to Wang Hong and Deng Yu highlight China&amp;rsquo;s ability to identify and nurture world-class mathematical talent. Yet, their achievements also underscore a more profound question: why doesn&amp;rsquo;t the substantial growth in talent, funding, and paper output automatically translate into more high-risk, long-cycle, original breakthroughs? The article argues that while a nation can plan research investment and infrastructure, it cannot schedule scientific discoveries, emphasizing that a research ecosystem&amp;rsquo;s capacity for originality hinges on its resource and risk allocation for long-term exploration.</description></item></channel></rss>