<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Organizational Resilience on C.CUI's Log</title><link>https://cuicaihao.github.io/tags/organizational-resilience/</link><description>Recent content in Organizational Resilience on C.CUI's Log</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-AU</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cuicaihao.github.io/tags/organizational-resilience/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Adaptive Cycle: Instability Lurks in Stability, Vitality Springs from Decay</title><link>https://cuicaihao.github.io/posts/2026-07-25-adaptive-cycle-instability-lurks-in-stability-vitality-springs-from-decay/</link><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://cuicaihao.github.io/posts/2026-07-25-adaptive-cycle-instability-lurks-in-stability-vitality-springs-from-decay/</guid><description>This blog post explores the Adaptive Cycle, a model explaining why seemingly stable systems can suddenly collapse and how decay can lead to new vitality. Drawing on Huang Yanpei&amp;rsquo;s observation of historical cycles, it argues that systems at their peak efficiency often accumulate vulnerabilities, leading to &amp;lsquo;sudden&amp;rsquo; demise. The article introduces Crawford Holling&amp;rsquo;s Adaptive Cycle (r, K, Ω, α), linking it to Buddhist concepts of &amp;lsquo;formation, abiding, decay, and emptiness,&amp;rsquo; and highlights how both over-optimization and creative destruction shape a system&amp;rsquo;s evolution.</description></item></channel></rss>