<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Organizational Design on C.CUI's Log</title><link>https://cuicaihao.github.io/tags/organizational-design/</link><description>Recent content in Organizational Design on C.CUI's Log</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-AU</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +1000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://cuicaihao.github.io/tags/organizational-design/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Commander's Intent: Shifting Control from "Action Details" to "Purpose, Tasks, Boundaries"</title><link>https://cuicaihao.github.io/posts/2026-07-08-commanders-intent-shifting-control-from-action-details-to-purpose-tasks-boundaries/</link><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://cuicaihao.github.io/posts/2026-07-08-commanders-intent-shifting-control-from-action-details-to-purpose-tasks-boundaries/</guid><description>This article explores &amp;ldquo;commander&amp;rsquo;s intent,&amp;rdquo; a management philosophy drawing parallels between military strategy and modern AI task delegation. It argues that just as AI agents thrive on clear purpose, key tasks, and defined boundaries rather than micromanaged steps, human employees also perform best when given autonomy within a well-understood strategic framework. The piece advocates shifting control from detailed actions to defining &amp;lsquo;why,&amp;rsquo; &amp;lsquo;what success looks like,&amp;rsquo; and &amp;lsquo;what not to sacrifice&amp;rsquo; to foster adaptability and empower teams.</description></item><item><title>Personal Allegiance and Role Responsibility: From Pre-modern to Modern Management</title><link>https://cuicaihao.github.io/posts/2026-07-06-personal-allegiance-and-role-responsibility-from-pre-modern-to-modern-management/</link><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 07:00:00 +1000</pubDate><guid>https://cuicaihao.github.io/posts/2026-07-06-personal-allegiance-and-role-responsibility-from-pre-modern-to-modern-management/</guid><description>This article contrasts &amp;ldquo;pre-modern management,&amp;rdquo; characterized by personal allegiance, favor, authority, kinship, and overt declarations of loyalty, with &amp;ldquo;modern management,&amp;rdquo; which emphasizes role responsibility and systemic processes. It details the operational logic of pre-modern systems, highlighting their effectiveness in small, low-complexity settings due to reliance on personalized trust. However, the piece also explores the inherent limitations of such models, particularly their inability to scale beyond a certain number of personal relationships, ultimately hindering the development of larger, more complex organizations.</description></item></channel></rss>