↓Skip to main content

WOOP: Awakening from the Default Settings of Life

·2527 words·12 mins

There was an American author named Napoleon Hill, one of the grandfathers of the “success studies” business, who published over a dozen books in his lifetime. In 1938, at the age of 55, Hill completed a book so shocking that his family and friends advised him not to publish it. It wasn’t until 2011, 41 years after his death, that the book finally saw the light of day.

The book is titled Outwitting the Devil, and it’s worth a read if you’re interested.

In the book, Hill interviews a demon, asking how he controls humanity. The demon replies that it’s simple: he doesn’t need complex conspiracies, only to keep people in a state of “drifting.”

“Drifting” means a person has no clear life goals, or even if they do, they lack a precise plan, so they involuntarily go with the flow. Such people let the environment, luck, and those around them make decisions for them, like a piece of wood floating in water. Hill, speaking through the demon, asserts that 98% of humanity spends their entire lives in this state of drifting.

Are you not the same?

A day passes in a blur: WeChat messages replied to, emails cleared, meetings attended, forms filled, plus two hours of short videos. As you lie down at night, it suddenly hits you: “What did I actually do today?”

Microscopically, every step you took wasn’t necessarily wrong, but macroscopically, you have no control over your destiny. You haven’t “laid flat,” but you’re only appearing to work hard. Sometimes you procrastinate—not out of laziness, but because you don’t know what to do, what to do first, or to what extent it counts as finished. Sometimes you want to make a big move, but you fear the criticism of others, so you continue to drift in a haze.

Hill calls this a “hypnotic rhythm”: your stable, automated, drifting life has hypnotized you, solidifying you into “just that kind of person.”

This is the normal life for 98% of people; this is life’s default setting. They have surrendered two pieces of personal sovereignty—the right to interpret life and the right to trigger action—to the outside world.

I call for your awakening. There’s a quote attributed to Elon Musk [1]: “I have never believed in anything like a lack of initiative in this world, because all initiative problems actually stem from a lack of precision.” The mental tool for this lecture is “WOOP,” which can break the hypnotic rhythm and restore your precision.

✵

Our entire course emphasizes being proactive, and WOOP is a tool for implementing that proactivity. Before explaining WOOP, I want to say a few more words about the harms of “passivity.”

In behavioral economics, there’s a fascinating concept called “Default Options”—the settings the system automatically assigns to you if you do nothing. A famous case [2] is that the organ donation consent rate in Austria is nearly 100%, while in Germany it’s only 12%. Are Austrians more moral? No. It’s simply because in Austria’s registration process, the default option is to consent, and those who don’t want to must check a box to opt out; in Germany, the default is not to donate, and those who want to must check a box to opt in.

People figured this out long ago: autoplay, default notifications, default recurring monthly subscriptions… these are everyday versions of default options. Modern society is very good at making decisions for you, arranging countless default settings: going to school, working, buying a house, obtaining fleeting happiness through consumption—and if you accidentally save some money along the way, the system even recommends a default pension plan for you.

Since everyone else is doing it, following along seems safe and reasonable. You’re a good person, but drifting will never make you exceptional: default settings only make you a functioning part of the social machine.

That is a road to mediocrity.

Default settings are perhaps the most expensive definition and the most oppressive narrative of most people’s lives.

So you say, “I won’t drift! I’ll jump out of the default settings and change my fate!” This usually means not doing the “correct” things, but doing things that are somewhat unconventional, risky, and particularly “hard.” Many successful people, in their acceptance speeches, like to say they succeeded through “willpower,” but that sounds more like self-indulgence. Willpower is actually a very inefficient resource; you can’t achieve much just by being “hard on yourself” or “disciplined.”

Discipline is inferior to habits [3], and habits come from systems. Discipline is the suppression of immediate impulses; habits are automated behaviors triggered by context; systems are mechanisms that outsource key behaviors to structures.

This brings us to WOOP.

✵

WOOP is a mental strategy popularized by psychologist Gabriele Oettingen [4]. It’s a four-step thinking process: Wish—Outcome—Obstacle—Plan.

  • Wish: Clearly define what goal you want to achieve.
  • Outcome: What good result will you get if the goal is achieved? Be specific about the feelings and imagine the scene.
  • Obstacle: Ask yourself: What is the internal obstacle holding you back from achieving your wish? It’s not about the environment, but your own reaction pattern.
  • Plan: What will you do once this obstacle appears? You need an actionable step.

For example, if I want to lose weight:

  • My W is to lose 10 pounds in a month.
  • My first O is that if I succeed, I’ll be healthier and my body will look better.
  • My second O is that as soon as I see delicious food, I want to eat more.
  • My P is to brush my teeth early in the evening to force myself to eat less.

WOOP is a thinking process that turns wishes into actions. It first lets you clarify the result you want most, then forces you to stare directly at the most critical obstacle, and finally writes what to do when encountering that obstacle as an automatically triggered “If-Then” plan.

No one in society requires me to lose weight; instead, society has medical facilities ready just in case I get sick from obesity. Losing weight is purely my own wish. It’s not that I don’t know what to do, but I can’t do it at the critical moment. How can I save myself? WOOP solves this problem.

✵

This sounds a bit like positive psychology—“believe in your dreams” and all that—but it’s actually not. Pop-success gurus love to have people fantasize, and fantasizing indeed feels good. When you fantasize about “I succeeded in losing weight” or “I got a promotion and a raise,” your blood pressure drops, your body relaxes… and the result is that your brain thinks you’ve already done it. Why work hard then? Consequently, your energy levels actually decrease [5].

WOOP is precisely a correction to positive psychology. The two Os combined form a weapon called “Mental Contrasting”: after fantasizing about a beautiful Outcome, you must immediately, ruthlessly pull your attention back to the reality of the Obstacle. At this point, you need to decide if the thing is actually feasible. If the obstacle is too great, WOOP requires you to exit gracefully to avoid wasting yourself on an impossible goal [6].

If it is feasible, mental contrasting creates a cognitive tension that makes you feel the gap between reality and the ideal, thereby increasing commitment, mobilizing energy, and driving action.

The second weapon of WOOP is “Implementation Intentions,” a concept proposed by Oettingen’s husband, the renowned psychologist Peter Gollwitzer [7]. It means you must write a piece of code for your brain, and the format of this code must be: “If…, then…”

“If I feel like looking at my phone (Obstacle), then I will immediately lock it in a drawer (Plan).” “If I feel angry (Obstacle), then I will take three deep breaths and remain silent (Plan).”

Gollwitzer’s research [8] shows that such simple plans can significantly promote goal achievement because they pre-bind “when, where, and how” to situational cues.

The logic of a drifter’s life is: Context arrives → I react randomly. The logic of a WOOP life is: Context arrives → I execute the pre-set plan.

Simply put, WOOP is one sentence: I want X; I fear Y most; if Y appears, I do Z.

This is programming the brain. WOOP compiles wishes into executable code, turning the “encountering an obstacle” context into a switch that triggers “action.”

✵

I’ve found through research that WOOP has been used in many areas, with supporting research results. WOOP helped middle school students in low-income communities improve their grades, attendance, and daily behavior, helping children withstand difficulties. Researchers have used WOOP to increase physical activity levels in middle-aged women, helping them move past excuses like “I’m a bit tired/cold/busy today” to go exercise. Another randomized controlled trial on the learning behavior of residents found that compared to “only setting goals,” the WOOP group spent significantly more time studying toward their goals…

Often, the smarter and busier people are, the more likely they are to drift. WOOP essentially helps them reduce on-the-spot decision-making and directly do what is most beneficial for their goals.

One of the most interesting cases involves caregivers of dementia patients [9]. If you have a relative with dementia and you must care for them, you often feel powerless to control the situation: the patient might get angry for no reason, get lost, or simply not recognize you. In this high-pressure, low-control context, “positive energy” is meaningless; you must face reality.

The caregivers in that study used WOOP like this:

  • W: I want to remain patient this week.
  • O: This way, both our dignities can be maintained, we can feel a connection of love, and I won’t fall into self-blame for losing my temper.
  • O: But when he asks me the same question ten times, I really want to explode.
  • P: If the patient repeats a question again, then I will say to myself, “This is the disease talking, not him,” and hold his hand.

Comparative studies showed that caregivers who used WOOP had significantly lower stress levels, significantly improved quality of life, and better depression indicators. Some said WOOP was their “safe haven.”

It seems WOOP is effective for both offense and defense.

✵

WOOP can help you clean up your wish list, turn fear into a trigger for brave action, and solve procrastination by improving task precision. WOOP turns a drifter’s “unsolvable” into a solvable next step; it’s a technique for reclaiming a bit of control in an uncontrollable life.

The power of WOOP is not in grand narratives, but in managing those tiny, critical moments.

Let’s look at two more application scenarios in daily life, both based on adding a few key “If-Then"s. Remember, the second O is your internal obstacle—never attribute it to the external environment.

One is controlling spending. You want to save money but can’t control the urge to “buy, buy, buy”:

  • W: Reach a 20% savings rate this month.
  • O: Feel the confidence of an increasing account balance and be at ease about the future.
  • O: The compensatory psychology when stressed—“I must buy something.”
  • P: If I want to shop online because I’m stressed, then I will first add the item to the cart and “freeze” it for 24 hours, instead taking a hot bath or going for a 15-minute walk.

You don’t lack financial knowledge; you lack a “stress → no shopping” replacement action.

Another is workplace ambition. You want to seize opportunities to prove yourself:

  • W: Proactively present results at the quarterly meeting.
  • O: Be seen, be trusted, and be assigned more important battles.
  • O: Fear of losing face; when my heart starts racing, I want to play dead.
  • P: If my heart starts racing at the meeting and I’m afraid to speak, then I will first say, “I’ll take 30 seconds to give a conclusion,” and then read out the first prepared point.

See, you don’t need to eliminate fear; you only need to make fear the trigger for action. WOOP doesn’t require you to immediately become a different person. It only asks you not to drift in that one second. With more experience, it will become a habit, and habits become second nature.

✵

Finally, I want to give you one more reason to use WOOP: peace of mind.

If you’re a drifter with many wishes that never come true but you’re unwilling to let go, your mind will be very cluttered. There’s the “Zeigarnik Effect” [10], which says that no matter what you’re doing, you’ll think about the things you were supposed to do but didn’t, making it impossible to be fully engaged. Those unfinished and unplanned tasks will wander through your subconscious like ghosts, occasionally jumping out to occupy your working memory. This is also called “Attention Residue” [11].

This is why you feel tired even when resting: because you have too many background programs running.

When you’ve WOOPed a task, turning the obstacle and countermeasure into an “If-Then,” you’re essentially telling your brain: “I’ve already thought this through; when the trigger condition appears, I’ll execute it, no need for you to keep reminding me.” Then the brain will consider the matter handled and remove it from your working memory.

You will enter a state similar to the “heart as still as water” in martial arts novels. You don’t need to constantly remember what to do; when the context appears, action happens automatically; when the context doesn’t appear, you can fully enjoy the present.

The brain is for thinking, not for remembering things. The initiative is in your hands.

This is the feeling of awakening from drifting.

Notes [1] This quote by Musk might be from an interview, but only subtitle screenshots exist online; the original source hasn’t been found. [2] Johnson, Eric J., and Daniel Goldstein. “Do Defaults Save Lives?” Science 302, no. 5649 (2003): 1338–1339. [3] Galla, Brian M., and Angela L. Duckworth. “More Than Resisting Temptation: Beneficial Habits Mediate the Relationship Between Self-Control and Positive Life Outcomes.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 109, no. 3 (2015): 508–25. [4] https://woopmylife.org/ [5] Kappes, Heather Barry, and Gabriele Oettingen. “Positive Fantasies About Idealized Futures Sap Energy.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 47, no. 4 (2011): 719–729. See also elite daily lesson Season 2, the negative effects of “positive energy.” [6] Oettingen, Gabriele, Hyeon-Ju Pak, and Karoline Schnetter. “Self-Regulation of Goal Setting: Turning Free Fantasies About the Future Into Binding Goals.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 80, no. 5 (2001): 736–753. [7] Gollwitzer, Peter M. “Implementation Intentions: Strong Effects of Simple Plans.” American Psychologist 54, no. 7 (1999): 493–503. [8] Gollwitzer, Peter M., and Paschal Sheeran. “Implementation Intentions and Goal Achievement: A Meta-Analysis of Effects and Processes.” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 38 (2006): 69–119. [9] Mroz, Emily L., et al. “‘WOOP is my safe haven’: A Qualitative Feasibility and Acceptability Study of the WOOP Intervention for Spouses of People Living With Early-Stage Dementia.” International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 39, no. 5 (2024). [10] Zeigarnik, Bluma. “On Finished and Unfinished Tasks.” Psychologische Forschung (1927). [11] Leroy, Sophie. “Why Is It So Hard to Do My Work? The Challenge of Attention Residue When Switching Between Work Tasks.” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 109, no. 2 (2009): 168–181.